Continuous monitoring — a clean file today is a stale file tomorrow
A customer, executive or counterparty who is clean at onboarding is not clean forever. Our monitoring is calibrated per subject, per risk, per jurisdiction — not a generic screening rerun.
Most monitoring fails by volume. Ours is built subject by subject: the triggers that matter for a private banking client are not the triggers that matter for a logistics vendor, and treating them identically produces noise that trained people learn to ignore.
§ 01Method
- 01
Per-subject trigger design
Each monitored subject receives a bespoke trigger set derived from its risk drivers — jurisdiction, sector, ownership complexity, political proximity and transaction profile — rather than a single global rule applied to everyone.
- 02
Source breadth with language coverage
Global sanctions and watchlists, regulatory enforcement registers, court and insolvency dockets, corporate registry deltas, and multilingual media — so that a filing in a local-language outlet is not missed because the pipeline only reads English.
- 03
Human triage and case memory
Alerts are adjudicated by analysts who hold the case history. A recurrence is recognised as a recurrence; a genuinely new development is escalated with context on what changed and why it matters now.
- 04
Routing and escalation
Findings go to the person with the authority to act, at a cadence agreed in advance, with a standing escalation path for material events.
- 01Sanctions and watchlist monitoring across global lists
- 02PEP and adverse media monitoring, sentiment-weighted
- 03Ownership and corporate structure change alerts
- 04Litigation, insolvency and regulatory action monitoring
- 05Executive and beneficial owner life-event monitoring
- 06Case-managed alert triage with human sign-off
- D01Bespoke monitoring profile per subject with documented trigger rationale
- D02Analyst-adjudicated alert notifications with context and recommended action
- D03Periodic portfolio summary with trend and materiality analysis
- D04Structure-change and ownership-delta reporting
- D05Annual monitoring efficacy review and recalibration
§ 02When to engage
Screening tool generating alert volumes nobody clears
Material adverse event discovered by a journalist before compliance
Long-tenure relationships never re-examined since onboarding
Portfolio spanning languages your current pipeline does not read
"Fewer, better alerts — routed to the person who can act on them."
§ 03Questions
- What cadence do you report on?
- Material events are escalated immediately. Everything else is consolidated to an agreed cadence — typically monthly or quarterly — so that inboxes stay signal-dense.
§ 04Adjacent domains
Program design, model tuning and regulatory readiness calibrated to live typologies.
Ownership decomposition and customer intelligence that survives opaque structures.
Our core discipline: cutting-edge data and analytics, driven by human review and out-of-the-box thinking.
Fraud, misconduct, asset tracing and disputes intelligence led by senior investigators.
Portfolio-level exposure analysis across counterparties, jurisdictions and sectors.
Every engagement begins with a scoping call.
Request a scoping call →